Since the exact version string is only available in the manifest,
there's no easy way of getting it before commiting to the update, so
there's not much of a good way of showing the updated name in the UI,
and using the displayName is weird and gives some buggy behavior.
We may want to re-enable it in the future if we find a reliable way of
showing the correct info on the UI before starting the update.
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
This allows us to pass to the creation instances their actual pack ID
and version ID, that in Flame's case, are only available before starting
to create an instance.
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
Now that #333 is merged and FS::copy works on non directory copyFile can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Rachel Powers <508861+Ryex@users.noreply.github.com>
If a version on Modrinth has more than a single mod loader associated,
it means that it's possible we might get the wrong file for download,
since individual files don't really have this kind of metadata in the
API response.
So, in such cases, it's best to let the user take care of it instead.
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
This prevents custom names from being lost when updating, by only
changing the name if the old instance name constains the old version,
so that we can update it if the user whishes to.
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
This makes it harder for problems in the updating process to affect the
current instance. Network issues, for instance, will no longer put the
instance in an invalid state.
Still, a possible improvement to this would be passing that logic to
InstanceStaging instead, to be handled with the instance commiting
directly. However, as it is now, the code would become very spaguetti-y,
and given that the override operation in the commiting could also put
the instance into an invalid state, it seems to me that, in order to
fully error-proof this, we would need to do a copy operation on the
whole instance, in order to modify the copy, and only in the end
override everything an once with a rename. That also has the possibility
of corrupting the instance if done without super care, however, so I
think we may need to instead create an automatic backup system, with an
undo command of sorts, or something like that. This doesn't seem very
trivial though, so it'll probably need to wait until another PR. In the
meantime, the user is advised to always backup their instances before
doing this kind of action, as always.
What a long commit message o.O
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
While working on pack updating, instance naming always gets in the way,
since we need both way of respecting the user's name choice, and a
standarized way of getting the original pack name / version.
This tries to circunvent such problems by abstracting away the naming
schema into it's own struct, holding both the original name / version,
and the user-defined name, so that everyone can be happy and world peace
can be achieved! (at least that's what i'd hope :c).
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
